The Glasgow membership say they’re “stunned” by the cost over Brown’s feedback and can “proceed to problem any motion we think about to be unfair or disproportionate”.
The SFA rule states: “A membership or recognised soccer physique which publishes, distributes, points, sells or authorises a 3rd get together to publish, distribute, concern or promote a match programme or some other publication or audio/visible materials of any description in any media now current or hereinafter invented, together with however not restricted to the Web, social networking or micro-blogging websites, shall make sure that any such publications or audio/visible materials doesn’t include any criticism of any match official calculated to point bias or incompetence on the a part of such match official or to impinge upon his character.”
Rangers word that 4 out of 5 members of the SFA’s Key Match Incident Panel deemed the choice to be incorrect, including that they’ve “critical considerations in regards to the Scottish FA’s selective enforcement and inconsistency”.
“That discovering helps clarify the character of a spontaneous emotional remark, delivered throughout a extremely charged second and instantly challenged reside on air,” Rangers add.
“We’ve got highlighted a number of examples of comparable or stronger remarks made elsewhere in Scottish soccer which have led to no expenses or sanctions.
“Whereas we stay dedicated to sustaining excessive requirements, we’ll proceed to problem any motion we think about to be unfair or disproportionate.”
About the Author
